Live signals, not stale firmographicsRe-classified each request, not annual exportsFree, not $15K seats

Segment · EdTech in Education

EdTech in Education: how Kustiq classifies it

An EdTech vendor sells software to K-12, higher-ed, or corporate L&D buyers, covering instruction, assessment, learning management, or workforce upskilling on a per-learner pricing model.

  • Stack signalSite references LMS integrations (Canvas, Moodle, Google Classroom, Blackboard) or LTI 1.3 compliance; a SOC 2 attestation if the product handles student PII.
  • Team signalLinkedIn shows an Instructional Design lead, a Customer Success function focused on educators, and named pedagogy advisors.
  • Revenue signalPer-learner or per-seat pricing with a published institution tier; named district, university, or enterprise customer logos.
Total in segment
97
Live count
Most common size
11-50
19 companies in bucket
Top funding
$40M
The Hoxhunt Human Risk Management Platform · Series B
Top HQ city
Charlotte
1 companies, 1%
More filters

Top 5 · ranked by funding stage and headcount

Top 5 EdTech companies in Education, ranked by funding stage and headcount
CompanyHQHeadcountStack
Find & Compare Career Training ProgramsSeries B51-200
SkilljarSeries B51-200
The Hoxhunt Human Risk Management PlatformSeries B
Dr Alex YoungSeries A1-10
AlmaBetterSeed51-200

FAQ · EdTech in Education

What buyers ask first

What is an EdTech company in Education?
K-12, higher-ed, and lifelong-learning EdTech. The classifier reads the homepage, careers page, and tech stack on every request, then maps the result to one of 22 verticals and 88 segments.
How many EdTech companies in Education are in the directory?
Kustiq currently tracks 97 EdTech companies in Education. New entrants are picked up the first time a domain hits the classifier with the right product, team, and revenue signals.
How are EdTech alternatives ranked here?
Tiles in this segment rank by snapshot recency, then by funding stage and headcount band. Open any tile for the full profile with SMTP-verified contacts, 12-factor churn risk, and 90-day buying signals; free, no card, 3 per week.
How accurate is the EdTech classification?
Each classification cites the public evidence behind the segment call so the call is reproducible. Companies that drop the relevant signals fall out of the segment the next time their profile is re-run.

Beyond the directory listing

Profile an EdTech company free in 60s.

The directory shows the snapshot. A full Kustiq profile pulls SMTP-verified contacts and a 12-factor churn risk, plus the buying signals from the last 90 days. The whole thing runs live on each request. Free plan covers 3 profiles a week, no card.

Why this Education EdTech directory looks different

Generic vendor lists rank by who paid for the listing. Kustiq ranks by what the live site, tech stack, and team graph say a company is right now. An EdTech company in Education with no relevant role on LinkedIn for 12 months and a stale pricing page falls out of the segment automatically. New entrants land the first time the classifier sees public stack signals, a matching careers page, and a recent funding round on the same domain.

Snapshot vs full profile

The tiles above are snapshots. Name, logo, HQ, headcount band, vertical, segment, and a confidence score the classifier published with the row. A full profile runs the complete pipeline on demand. SMTP verifies up to three buyer contacts. The 12-factor rule engine returns a churn risk with calibrated confidence. The buying-signal pass surfaces hiring, funding, tech, press, RFP, and engagement events from the last 90 days. Every Kustiq account gets 3 full profiles per week, free, no card.

How the segment is reclassified

Every snapshot is rebuilt from public web signals at request time. The classifier reads the live homepage, the pricing page, the careers page, the job board, and the public LinkedIn surface, then maps the result to one of 22 verticals and 88 segments. A company can move from EdTech into a sibling segment, or out of the directory entirely, on the next request. There is no annual export.