Kustiq
Profile a company free
Comparisonscredits, not contracts · profiles, not lookups · two-minute signup

Kustiq vs every major B2B data tool, graded on the same rubric.

Nine comparison pages. Every one rates the same four dimensions, side by side. Pick the tool you are already evaluating against, see the price story in one line, then read the full deep page.

01Price02Freshness03Contracts04Setup
Tier 01

Big-database enterprise

3 tools · annual contracts · sales-led

Sold on annual contracts at $15k and up. The price story per Kustiq Pro year ($1,428) lands at roughly 10% of an entry quote, with no procurement cycle.

ZoomInfo

/vs/zoominfo

ZoomInfo is $15k+ a year, sold via demo with annual lock-in. Kustiq is $0 to $119 a month, cancel anytime, signup in two minutes.

ZoomInfo$15k / yr
10× cheaper
Kustiq Pro$1,428 / yr
Enterprise databaseRead comparison →

Cognism

/vs/cognism

Cognism is annual-contract EMEA contact data with a GDPR story. Kustiq is self-serve, month-to-month, per-profile intelligence.

Cognism$15k-$40k / yr
10× cheaper
Kustiq Pro$1,428 / yr
EMEA · GDPR-firstRead comparison →

Clearbit

/vs/clearbit

Clearbit is now Breeze Intelligence, locked behind HubSpot Pro at $800+/mo. Kustiq is profiling on any CRM, or none at all.

HubSpot Pro$800+ / mo
7× cheaper
Kustiq Pro$119 / mo
HubSpot bundleRead comparison →
Tier 02

Sequencer plus database

2 tools · per-seat · bundled outreach

All-in-one stacks priced per seat. Adding teammates multiplies the bill. Kustiq is one plan for the whole team, no seat math.

Apollo

/vs/apollo

Apollo bundles 275M+ contact records, sequences, and a dialer at $59 to $99 a seat. Kustiq is one $119 a month plan for the whole team, with deeper company intelligence per credit.

Apollo Basic · 5 seats$295 / mo
2.5× cheaper
Kustiq Pro · team$119 / mo
Sequencer + DBRead comparison →

Seamless

/vs/seamless-ai

Seamless.AI charges per seat with daily credit throttles. Kustiq has no caps, no daily limits, one plan.

Seamless · seat$147 / mo
3× cheaper
Kustiq Insight$39 / mo
Daily throttlesRead comparison →
Tier 03

Contact-lookup tools

3 tools · Chrome extensions · per-seat

Built for finding emails and phone numbers fast. Kustiq returns a 20-field profile per credit with the verified contact already inside.

RocketReach

/vs/rocketreach

RocketReach finds emails and phones at scale via Chrome extension. Kustiq finds the right account, the right hook, and the verified contact, all in one credit.

RocketReach · 5 seats$535 / mo
4× cheaper
Kustiq Pro$119 / mo
700M static DBRead comparison →

Lusha

/vs/lusha

Lusha is a phone-and-email reveal layer over LinkedIn. Kustiq is full company intelligence, with the SMTP-verified contact as one of 20 fields.

Lusha · seat$37 / mo
3× more depth
Kustiq Insight$39 / mo
Reveal extensionRead comparison →

LeadIQ

/vs/leadiq

LeadIQ is a per-seat Chrome extension on top of LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Kustiq is per-credit company intelligence with no extension and no LinkedIn dependency.

LeadIQ · 5 seats$445 / mo
4× cheaper
Kustiq Pro$119 / mo
LinkedIn extensionRead comparison →
Tier 04

Workflow builders

1 tool · multi-provider orchestration

For RevOps teams who want to script every enrichment step across 150+ providers. Kustiq covers the same end result with one API call.

Clay

/vs/clay · workflow builder

Clay is a visual workflow builder for RevOps teams chaining 150+ data providers into multi-step enrichment. Kustiq returns the same finished profile from one domain input, with churn risk and ICP scoring already baked in. No workflow setup, no credits-per-step math.

RevOps workflowRead full comparison →
Clay Starter$149 / mo
Kustiq Insight$39 / mo
2,000 lookups vs 100 finished profiles

Clay credits run a single provider lookup. Kustiq credits return a full 20-field profile, so a workflow that needs 10-15 Clay credits per company maps to 1 Kustiq credit.

Common questions before you pick a comparison

4 answers · 1 minute
What does each comparison page actually grade?
Every deep page rates the same four dimensions: price (per profile, per seat, per year), data freshness (real time vs static database), contracts (month to month vs annual), and setup time (paste a domain vs procurement plus onboarding). Same rubric, every tool.
Why is the grid grouped into four tiers?
Different tools fail at different things. Big-database enterprise tools fail on price and contracts. Sequencer plus database tools fail on per-seat math. Lookup tools fail on company intelligence. Workflow builders fail on setup time. Grouping by failure mode makes a head-to-head pick faster.
How do I try Kustiq without a contract?
Sign in and run 3 full company profiles a week, no card. Each profile is 20 fields with a SMTP-verified contact, ICP score, churn risk, and 88-segment classification. Insight is $39 a month for 200 profiles. Pro is $119 a month for 800.
The tool I am evaluating is not on this list. What do I do?
Use the side-by-side compare picker for any two B2B companies, free. If the missing tool is a serious comparison, mail support and we will draft the deep page within a week.

Try the product

Profile any B2B domain. Free, in 60s.

Nine comparison pages tell you what Kustiq is not. One run tells you what it is. 20 fields with a verified contact, the churn read, and where they sit on the ICP. 3 profiles a week, no card.

Profile a company free →See pricing
3 profiles a weekno cardSMTP-verified contactscancel anytime