Company profile

Charitynavigator

www.charitynavigator.org. According to a 2025 study, ratings by Charity Navigator shape donor behaviors, as donors increase their contributions to better ...
Charitynavigator logo

Live profile

Last verified 6 months ago
kustiq.com/company/charitynavigator.org · cite this page

www.charitynavigator.org. According to a 2025 study, ratings by Charity Navigator shape donor behaviors, as donors increase their contributions to better ...

Employees

11-50

AI Classification

NonprofitFoundation/NGO

Charity Navigator is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and the largest U.S. charity evaluator, rating 245,000+ organizations using IRS data and a proprietary Encompass Rating System. It serves individual donors and philanthropists through free research tools, an AI-powered search engine, and a Giving Basket platform that has processed $338M+ in donations.

No deep intelligence yet

Run a full profile to see buying signals, account scoring, pain signals, and recommended contacts for Charitynavigator.

Social Links

Competitors

Charity NavigatorCharityWatch vs. Guidestar vs. GreatNonprofits

Charitynavigator is one of 2,678 B2B companies in the Kustiq directory.

Charitynavigator sits among 61 foundation / ngo companies in our Nonprofit directory.

Similar profiles: CellBlock FCS, Growthbook, Complianceexperts, and Resend · Email for developers.

Both sit in the 11-50 headcount band. See Charitynavigator vs CellBlock FCS side by side.

Both sit in the 11-50 headcount band. See Charitynavigator vs Growthbook side by side.

Both sit in the 11-50 headcount band. See Charitynavigator vs Complianceexperts side by side.

Segment benchmark

How Charitynavigator compares with other Foundation/NGO companies

Charitynavigator is one of 61 Foundation/NGO companies profiled in the Kustiq Nonprofit directory, which holds 136 Nonprofit companies in total. Every number below is computed from those profiles.

Charitynavigator sits in the 11-50 headcount band. 26% of the 39 segment peers with a known team size are smaller. 41% of those peers share the same band.

The most common tech detections across the 17 peers with a visible stack are Cloudflare (53%), Google Analytics (47%), and jQuery (47%). Charitynavigator lists none of them.

The median founding year across 17 peers with a known founding date is 1997.

Dallas is the most common HQ city in this segment, home to 10% of the 10 peers with a known location.

Benchmarks are recomputed from live directory data, so they move as profiles refresh. Counts cover Kustiq-profiled companies, not the whole market.

How Kustiq built this profile

How this profile was built

  • Live web rendering via a headless browser, not a stale cached scrape.
  • Search intelligence via targeted web search across the company site, LinkedIn, press, and GitHub.
  • Claude only picks the buckets. It never decides facts.
  • 12-factor churn engine. Deterministic score, zero LLM at scoring time.
  • SMTP RCPT TO handshake on every contact, at delivery time on full profiles (paid plan).

This profile was built from search coverage across the live web on .

Read the full methodology in our LLM-readable reference or compare against the deterministic-vs-AI framework.

Frequently asked questions

How many employees does Charitynavigator have?
Charitynavigator has 11-50 employees, based on public sources read at the last profile run. That makes it larger than 26% of the 39 profiled Foundation/NGO peers with a known team size.
What industry is Charitynavigator in?
Charitynavigator is a Nonprofit company in the Foundation/NGO segment.
Who are Charitynavigator's competitors?
Public sources list Charity Navigator and CharityWatch vs. Guidestar vs. GreatNonprofits as Charitynavigator competitors. The list comes from live search coverage at the last profile run, not a static database.
Is this profile actually verified, or just generated by AI?
The structured fields come from a hybrid pipeline. Facts (location, employee range, funding, tech stack) come from live web rendering plus targeted web search across the company site, LinkedIn, press, and GitHub. Claude only picks the buckets: vertical, segment, growth signal. It never decides facts. Contact emails on full profiles pass an SMTP RCPT TO handshake at delivery time.
How is this different from a contact database?
Kustiq profiles one company at a time, live from the web when you ask. Tools like Apollo and ZoomInfo rent access to a 50M+ row pool that ages every quarter. Different shape, different price, and the freshness story is the opposite.
What does "track this profile" do?
Tracking saves Charitynavigator to your free dashboard so you can re-run the full pipeline on it anytime. Free with a signed-in account: 10 profiles a week, no card.
Can the profiled company remove this page?
Any company in the Kustiq directory can request removal at /trust#removal. Removed profiles return 410 Gone and stay out of search.
How fresh is the data?
Charitynavigator was last verified 6 months ago. The data refreshes when anyone re-runs the profile (the Re-run now button above does exactly that), and we run the SMTP handshake on contacts when you ask for them, not when we cached the row. The freshness card above the profile shows the exact relative date for the current visit.
Part of 2,678 AI-profiled B2B companies

Profile your whole pipeline.

Sign up free, 10 profiles a week, no card. Save Charitynavigator and re-run every company you research whenever you need fresh data.